Review Detail

The other reviewers have done better than I can in reviewing this,
and like they said, this is a fantastic resource.
I have found all of the interviews excellent.

At one point, Sinn gives his response to, "We're not having sex tonight."
This is often said by a girl who just invited you to her place (in my experience),
or is on her way to your place.

I have tried Sinn's response (I don't think he came up with it, but he endorsed it in this interview by interrupting Savoy when Savoy was about to give a better response and Sinn just gave this response),
and it doesn't work very well. At least not for me.
His idea is to make it seem like it was your idea, that you made the rule that you're not having sex.
I have done this pre-emptively as well, using the line, "Okay you can come over, but my pants stay on."

On paper, the above line (not Sinn's), is both hilarious (to us men anyway)
and looks like it would be very effective (it's definitely Cocky/Funny).

However, in practice, that line eventually leads to a weird incongruence.
She will either say, "Aw, man. No fair."
Or she will say, "Good, and underwear, skirt, blouse, and shoes stay on."

I can think of some ways to deal with the first positive response.
The second response is a bit ticklish. Now you have both just enthusiastically agreed that all your clothes will stay on (and nobody is having sex). How are you going to now take off your pants or her clothes (okay...I HAVE used that line and simply taken off my pants with no explanation; but seriously it feels weird doing that after previously making a rule that your pants stay on).

Savoy's response was, "Why are you so obsessed about sex when you’re with me? Why is everything about sex with you?" This is a good response.

Anyway, MUCH BETTER, MUCH MORE EFFECTIVE line is one that they didn't mention in this interview.
The line that has NEVER FAILED when I've used it, as a response to, "We're not having sex though,"
is this: "We're both grownups. We'll do what want."

I got that amazing line from Payton Kane.
Those are 8 words that you should memorize.

If you want to complicate things, you could combine Savoy's and Payton Kane's response into one:
"Why are you so obsessed about sex when you’re with me? Why is everything about sex with you? We’re both grown-ups; we’ll do what we want."

That might be good.

What they didn't mention is this. It's important.
When a girl says this, she's actually saying it out of reflex, as a token formality.
She wants to have sex, but she doesn't want to be perceived as a slut.
So the most important thing, above any lines you use, is to know that
it doesn't mean anything. You can agree with her, you can maybe even disagree with her (risky if you don't know what you're doing), but you MUST be non-reactive.

THE BAD:

The reason I rated this low on innovation
is because Ajax stole a line from Ross Jeffries and gave no credit.
What is it with PUAs? Where is the class?

Ross Jeffries came up with frame control, came up with disqualification,
and came up with take-aways. Nobody gives him credit these days.
Everybody says that Mystery came up with just about everything.
RJ also came up with the voice mail, "Hi, this is Ajax, I never heard back from you and I thought I’d give you one last shot at getting a chance to talk. One of the things I learned about living in LA is that beauty is common. But people with a great energy, attitude, and outlook are rare, and they are worth getting to know. I think that’s an understanding that goes both ways, so I hope you can find your own reasons to call me back."

Ajax just read the above, with no shame. That is probably illegal,
selling an interview series where you just read a paragraph from a Ross Jeffries book
without giving any credit or citing the source.

Shame on Ajax for stealing that and not giving Ross Jeffries the proper credit.
PUAs could learn a thing about ethics from Magicians.
Whenever a Magician writes an instructional book or makes a DVD,
he, the author, ALWAYS explains where every maneuver came from, who invented it,
and whose later variation the author is using.